From: "Paganini <Nathan E. Banks>" <paganini AT madisontelco DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Assembler types
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 1999 19:56:43 -0600
Organization: Info Avenue Internet Services
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <7bsmc2$rvt$1@news3.infoave.net>
References: <7bran9$eoh$1 AT news3 DOT infoave DOT net> <MxfBZaB97W42Ewiz AT xemu DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> <7bsfcn$2rb$1 AT news3 DOT infoave DOT net> <K76gLzApnc42EwDt AT xemu DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ham107.madisontelco.com
X-Trace: news3.infoave.net 920771778 28669 206.28.233.107 (7 Mar 1999 01:56:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT news3 DOT infoave DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 Mar 1999 01:56:18 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.0810.800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.0810.800
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Dave Bird <dave AT xemu DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> wrote in message
news:K76gLzApnc42EwDt AT xemu DOT demon DOT co DOT uk...

> Oh yes, all produce the same machine code.  But native GNU does it
> in vax-style code "mov $15,%eax"
> and MASM/NASM in Intel-style "mov eax,15".

So neither one is really better than the other...it's just religious...like
whether to comment or to document?

--
Paganini <Nathan E. Banks>
MOOk, the Great High Llama
ICQ 25308827
http:\\web.madisontelco.com\~paganini