From: "DJ Enormous Beats" <lounge_chair AT hotmail DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References: <36d16c26 DOT 0 AT news DOT wincom DOT net> <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 32 DOT 19990225001710 DOT 0093ebe0 AT pop DOT globalserve DOT net> <36D5B0F7 DOT 1E83645F AT cartsys DOT com>
Subject: Re: another rsxntdj problem
Lines: 43
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.0810.800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.0810.800
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: a-xlvi.wincom.net
Message-ID: <36d6bb50.0@news.wincom.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 15:17:47 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.148.26.25
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 10:17:47 EST
Organization: Shaw FiberLink Toronto
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

I fixed it by editing it with notepad, but it still hasn't fixed my problem
of no longer being able to compile both windows and dos programs, or c++
windows programs, which doesn't really concern me too much right now.

kev
http://www.skapunx.net/~swinginska/

Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com> wrote in message
news:36D5B0F7 DOT 1E83645F AT cartsys DOT com...
>Paul Derbyshire wrote:
>>
>> At 06:05 PM 2/22/99 +0200, you wrote:
>> >
>> >On Mon, 22 Feb 1999, DJ Enormous Beats wrote:
>> >
>> >> I tried to compile the cplus example that it comes with, but it says
there
>> >> is an error in the makefile.   It says "makefile:13: *** missing
separator.
>> >> Stop."
>> >
>> >This is explained in section 22.16 of the DJGPP FAQ list: you need to
>> >make sure that line 13 in the Makefile beginst with a TAB character, not
>> >with spaces.
>>
>> This was a makefile that *came with the examples*, not one he made
>> himself... it's not good for someone to distribute a package with a bogus
>> makefile. If Shawn shipped a bad makefile in Allegro 3.2 for example,
>> there'd be a million pissed off programmers who happen to have no
makefile
>> experience spamming up the Allegro list and this one with complaints :-)
>
>It's possible, however, that they edited the Makefile (some Makefiles
>are to be edited for local configuration) with an editor that munged it.
>
>To the poster: Did you edit the Makefile at all?  If not, you may wish
>to complain to the author of the file.
>--
>
>Nate Eldredge
>nate AT cartsys DOT com