Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 19:54:54 -0500
Message-Id: <199902200054.TAA01062@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com, egcs AT egcs DOT cygnus DOT com, egcs-bugs AT cygnus DOT com
In-reply-to: <3.0.6.32.19990219194528.00841eb0@pop.netaddress.com> (message
	from Paul Derbyshire on Fri, 19 Feb 1999 19:45:28 -0500)
Subject: Re: Missing header files.
References:  <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 32 DOT 19990219194528 DOT 00841eb0 AT pop DOT netaddress DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


> Please correct these errors in future distributions of the GNU tools.

If you wish to have a guarantee that this is fixed in the next
version, I can put you in touch with a sales person who will discuss
service contract options with you.

Otherwise, you are making demands of *volunteers* who are much more
amenable to polite queries than to rigid demands.  An approach more
likely to succeed would be to reference the section of the relevent
specs that describe those headers and *ask* if those headers would be
in future distributions.

You could, of course, offer to provide a fix yourself, if you are so
inclined.