From: "Kelly Harrelson" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc Subject: Re: 16-bit Apps under Windows NT Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 23:35:26 -0500 Organization: MindSpring Enterprises Lines: 53 Message-ID: <7adgtb$h94$1@samsara0.mindspring.com> References: <7acb6p$9fk$1 AT news0-alterdial DOT uu DOT net> <7acv11$ef0$1 AT remarQ DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: d1.56.62.b5 X-Server-Date: 17 Feb 1999 04:34:51 GMT X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com The compiler was Metaware's High-C v1.6. I don't believe it was loading a DOS extender. J. Marshall wrote in message <7acv11$ef0$1 AT remarQ DOT com>... >You don't specify *which* compiler it is, so I can only offer a guess: >some, many, of the old 16 bit compilers load a DOS extender as part or their >operation. That will present you with a problem on an NT machine. >Buy a newer compiler, or get a machine for dedicated use for your 16bit >development. If networked, it could share files, and something like a >200MHz Pentium running DOS 6.22 would only cost about $600, maybe less, >these days. > > > >Kelly Harrelson wrote in message <7acb6p$9fk$1 AT news0-alterdial DOT uu DOT net>... >>I have an *old* 16-bit cross compiler that runs under DOS and generates >>.OBJs for a proprietary platform. The compiler worked fine under DOS, >>Windows 3.11, and Windows 95. When we moved to Windows NT, we ran into >>problems. Running it under the default shell, cmd.exe >>(\winnt\system32\cmd.exe), would cause the entire shell to exit, instantly, >>with no error messages or anything. One of our developers noticed however >>that it ran fine under the command.com shell (\winnt\system32\command.com). >>So, we happily continued using it under the alternate shell. Now, with >>Windows NT Service Pack 4 installed (as well as Developer Studio 97 Service >>Pack 3, although I don't know if that could effect it), it has stopped >>working, but not in the same way as before. When calling the compiler from >>a batch file, the batch file just exits and the shell stays intact. >Calling >>the compiler from NMAKE just causes NMAKE to hang. >> >>Has anyone else noticed any problems with older 16-bit apps? Anyone have >>any ideas? Does anyone know why it worked for a while under command.com but >>not cmd.exe? >> >>If there is another group I should post this to, please let me know. This >>problem is quite frustrating and I would really like to get it solved. Any >>help would be appreciated. >> >>Thanks in advance. >>-Shane >> >> > >