Message-ID: <36859B17.CD70960C@montana.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1998 19:27:35 -0700
From: bowman <bowman AT montana DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Cygwin ?? Rsxntdj ??
References: <199812261524 DOT PAA23894 AT remus> <36851191 DOT 8D7B138D AT montana DOT com> <368532AA DOT 85BA8AA0 AT cableol DOT co DOT uk> <763eml$15f6$1 AT news DOT doit DOT wisc DOT edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com



Mumit Khan wrote:
> 
> Not at all. The poster forgot to "strip" the binaries before comparing
> the sizes. The other way is to use "-s" when linking the programs using
> gcc/c++/etc.

Ah, precisely. Thank you. I haven't used minG too much and assumed the
binary was stripped automagically like the rsxntdj. If nothing else,
minG doesn't come with anything remotely resembling the djgppFAQ. Guess
that's part of the 'minimal'.

> btw, someone mentioned a hefty Cygwin DLL; I see mine to be roughly 450k,
> which IMO doesn't fit into the "hefty" category that well.

I live in a past cluttered with 180K 5 1/4 in floppies. Just showing my
age.