From: Kevin Ashley <k DOT ashley AT ulcc DOT ac DOT uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: LARGE numbers.
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1998 10:48:11 +0100
Organization: Posted via ULCC Internet Services
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <35EBC2DB.41C6@ulcc.ac.uk>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 980830171433 DOT 20257V-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host: silver.ulcc.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 27 Aug 1998, Kevin Ashley wrote:
> 
> > You could use long long int (64-bit) as others have
> > pointed out, but this is gcc or architecture specific and the I/O libraries
> > did not fully support them when I last checked.
> 
> You might consider checking again.  Long long is fully supported by
> libc, AFAIK, since v2.01 was released.

I stand corrected - thanks for putting this straight. I should have pointed out
in my original post that 'the last time I checked' was a long time ago.