Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 17:17:08 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: russell DOT thamm AT dsto DOT defence DOT gov DOT au
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: UPDATE : Page Fault During Interupt
In-Reply-To: <6s501c$rih$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980830171643.20257W-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Fri, 28 Aug 1998 russell DOT thamm AT dsto DOT defence DOT gov DOT au wrote:

> I make my judgement about this on the basis of Rhide. In a DOS box (at home)
> and under CWSDPR0 (and CWSDPMI with virtual memory disabled), Rhide always
> reports less available memory than physical memory. Under CWSDPMI with
> virtual memory enabled, Rhide always reports more available memory than
> physical memory.
> 
> On my work machine, this is not so for a DOS box.
> 
> I have no idea what the difference is.

Why do you need to use RHIDE to get a memory report?  Just run go32-v2
in all these environments, post the results together with information
about how much physical RAM is installed, and let's see what we can
make out of that.