From: Troy VanHorn <trvanhor AT UCollege DOT edu>
Message-Id: <199808250016.UAA24168@snoopy.UCollege.edu>
Subject: Re: What do I need ?
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 20:16:09 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: trvanhor AT snoopy DOT UCollege DOT edu (Troy VanHorn)
In-Reply-To: <199808211447.QAA24894@ieva06.lanet.lv> from Andris Pavenis at Aug "21," 1998 "04:51:08" pm
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

libraries built with gcc-2.8.0 with gcc-2.8.1 (warning: there will be 
similar problems with upcomming egcs-1.1)


Andris


============================================================================

     Speaking of egcs, (or gcc for that matter), is there any chance that a
future release of gcc or egcs for djgpp will be properly configured to
produce local lables that will really be local?  As it is now with gcc
2.8.1, if I compile some C++ with exceptions enabled, the resulting object
files are really bloated, and it doesn't need to be that way.  I reallize I
could probably recompile GAS to support the old method of local labels which
gcc now produces, but it would be better if the compiler itself was properly
configured.

     I've also considered writing a program which would "fix" the output of
gcc before being assembled, but I don't know if there is any way for it to
be automatically inserted between the compiler and assembly stages of
gcc.exe.

Troy Van Horn.....