Message-ID: <35CA6B62.C58713DF@geocities.com> From: Merlin MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: allegro == or != programming References: <003901bdbf18$044f2d20$6aeebc8c AT atchison2 DOT prc DOT com> <35cc6d82 DOT 19271265 AT news DOT Austria DOT EU DOT net> <35C899AC DOT 51D008B4 AT cartsys DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 39 Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1998 02:52:45 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 223-cy-wpg.ilos.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1998 21:52:45 CDT Organization: MBnet Networking Inc. To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk Nate Eldredge wrote: > Gerhard Gruber wrote: > > > > Destination: "Jerome Atchison" > > From: Gruber Gerhard > > Group: comp.os.msdos.djgpp > > Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 14:39:16 -0500: > > > > >I suggest to Merlin to try writting his next program in assembler, because C > > > > But than he has to use an assembler. That's cheating. :) But there are a lot > > of good books about 80x86 assembly programming so you can calculate the byte > > values needed for a program. :) > > But think of all the microcode the Intel engineers wrote, and how much > you're using that. That's cheating. Okay, so you have to design your > own CPU, motherboard, hardware, etc. But wait-- think of all the work > that went into inventing the transistor. You use it-- that's cheating, > too... > > Face it-- you can't do anything all by yourself, so why even try? > -- To learn..... because the person likes to. There are quite a few reasons to do something yourself..or at least try to. Merlin. > > > Nate Eldredge > nate AT cartsys DOT com