From: sparhawk AT eunet DOT at (Gerhard Gruber)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: allegro == or != programming
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1998 21:20:28 GMT
Organization: EUnet Austria
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <35cd6e37.19452436@news.Austria.EU.net>
References: <000401bdbfaa$e893fc80$ec4b08c3 AT arthur>
NNTP-Posting-Host: e168.dynamic.vienna.at.eu.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 Aug 1998 21:21:18 GMT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Destination: "Arthur" <arfa AT clara DOT net>
From: Gruber Gerhard
Group: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:22:20 +0100:

>included) like to have 100% control over their code. If I use an Allegro function I
>make it my business to ensure I know it inside out and back to front. For instance, I
>am at the moment hacking into Allegro's BITMAP structure and writing an alternative
>sprite routine that accesses data on a lower level than blit.

And that's the great advantage of using GNU stuff. :) In the V library I'm
using I noticed some shortcomings and I added them myself. Ever tried to do
this with a MS product? :))) Full control indeed.

--
Bye,
   Gerhard

email: sparhawk AT eunet DOT at
       g DOT gruber AT sis DOT co DOT at

Spelling corrections are appreciated.