Message-ID: <199806152230370340.001F6362@pogwizd.tcs.uni.wroc.pl>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 22:30:37 +0200
From: "Pawel Kowalski" <pk AT tcs DOT uni DOT wroc DOT pl>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Turbo Assembler & DJGPP
Precedence: bulk

>Pawel Kowalski (pk AT tcs DOT uni DOT wroc DOT pl) wrote:
>: What about NASM? Is it worth downloading? Is it possible to
>: write something like this in NASM:
>: 
>: extern ___djgpp_ds_alias
>: 
>: and compile it to coff, then link it along with a djgpp program?
>: Is NASM better than GAS?
>
>Now, take what I say with a pinch of salt, as I've never used it. I
>think people use it successfully. And as I think it does understand
>Intel syntax and can generate coff, I think this is exactly what you
>need.
>
>Well it depends what you want to use it for: for your code in Intel
>syntax, it's better than gas; for code generated by gcc gas is
>probably better. Yes?
>
>Verify what I've said before you decide, as I've never used it.
>
>
>Throwing Muses, Red Heaven,
>
>							MartinS
>

Yesterday (or the day before yesterday) I've asked you a question 
concerning NASM. Today I managed to solve that problem, but thanks
for your answers anyway...

-PK