Sender: nate AT cartsys DOT com
Message-ID: <357DD8F1.A0F60C26@cartsys.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 1998 17:53:05 -0700
From: Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rudd AT cyberoptics DOT com
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Possible gcc bug
References: <357D578B DOT 1088A0F9 AT cyberoptics DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Eric Rudd wrote:
> 
> I have isolated what I think is a register-allocation bug in gcc
> v2.7.2.1 having to do with incorrect handling of extended asm. I would
> appreciate feedback from others as to what is wrong here. The little
> subroutine does nothing useful in its condensed form besides
> illustrating the problem. I compiled with
> 
> gcc -O2 -S bad.c -o bad.lst
> 
> Attached to this message is the contents of "bad.lst". Compiling without
> -O2 produces different code, but also incorrect.
[snipped]

Upgrade your GCC. It compiles correctly with GCC 2.8.1.
-- 

Nate Eldredge
nate AT cartsys DOT com