From: sl AT psycode DOT com DOT NOSPAM (Gili) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: REQUEST: PGCC v1.02 for DOS Date: 23 May 1998 05:10:31 GMT Organization: All USENET -- http://www.Supernews.com Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <6k48sr$54s$1 AT rosenews DOT rose DOT hp DOT com> Reply-To: sl AT psycode DOT com DOT NOSPAM NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.205.118.65 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk On Fri, 22 May 1998 16:25:01, "Andrew Crabtree" wrote: > > Gili wrote in message ... > > PGCC v1.02 is out and no one has volunteered to release the sources, > >so . . . It's all up to _YOU_! :) > You mean sources or binaries? You can get the sources from the goof home > page of course. If you want my specific patches from the 1.0.1 distribution > I can provide them as well. But, since egcs 1.0.3 has been released I would > think there will be a pgcc 1.0.3 soon too. Don't look for binaries anytime > soon though, I have no plans of making them. AFAIK there is only a couple > of fpu code gen fixes that could affect djgpp users, and nobody has ever hit > them except in test cases. I will be releasing a c only version of a may > snapshot soon. As for C++, the compiler itself works, but the egcs boys > totally broke the configure mechanism for building libio again. I understand. So when can we expect an update to the PGCC binaries? When/if PGCC 1.0.4 is out and the configuration mechanism is fixed? If so, great ;) Thank you for your help, Gili