Date: 11 May 98 12:08:12 GMT
Message-ID: <wanpsm98.894888492@octarine>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: MAYDAY!! IS PGCC BETTER THAT GCC?!
References: <B0001784304 AT ritig6 DOT rit DOT reuters DOT com> <01bd7cc5$d98add80$054cdac3 AT default>
From: wanpsm98 AT octarine DOT cc DOT adfa DOT oz DOT au (WANKADIA PAUL SAPAL MICHAEL)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 131.236.253.20
Lines: 19
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

"Daleg" <pekkaka AT dlc DOT fi> writes:

>MAYDAY!!! MAYDAY!!!

For a minute, I thought you'd shot yourself in the foot or something...

>Tell me is it worth to get PGCC is it that much better than GCC?

If you're coding a computationally-intense program that will require a 
Pentium to perform decently, then PGCC might be what you need.

>what's new in that?, im doing just fine with GCC, i heard that PGCC is in
>alpha version, can it mess up my sources or not work at all?

If you're worried about protecting your sources, make them read-only just 
before you compile and then restore them to read-write just after 
compilation is finished.

It's liable to malfunction if you feed it Ada source code.