Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 21:27:36 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199802070527.VAA19118@adit.ap.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: rwh AT worldonline DOT nl, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
From: Nate Eldredge <eldredge AT ap DOT net>
Subject: Re: Keeping speed with slow CPUs
Precedence: bulk

At 07:35  2/6/1998 +0100, Reinier Heeres wrote:

>You really should install a timer by hooking interrupt 0. It will be
>called 18.2 times/sec. Let your handler set a flag that it's allowed to
>draw a new frame...
INT 0?? Unless something has changed drastically, that's the divide-by-zero
interrupt. I presume you mean INT 8 or INT 0Ch (the handler for the one
calls the other).

Since the original poster is using Allegro, he should use its timer
functions rather than messing about with interrupt hooking.

Nate Eldredge
eldredge AT ap DOT net