From: "Ron Aaron" <ron AT mrrrossbayeng DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.editors,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: announce: VIM5 release "v" for DOS
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 12:27:02 -0800
Organization: Moss Bay Engineering
Lines: 21
Distribution: inet
Message-ID: <6baj0g$lbf@news.microsoft.com>
References: <34D7E715 DOT 5719 AT primenet DOT com> <slrn6dg7dq DOT o1v DOT davep AT hagbard DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.31.66.165
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Dave,

Dave Pearson wrote in message ...
>On 3 Feb 1998 20:46:00 -0700, Smith A. Cat <imbe AT primenet DOT com> wrote:
>
>> You should NOT use the DOS binary in Win95 except when rebooting into DOS
>> mode.
>
>Any reason why?


Yes:
    a) because 16-bit exe support is not excellent under Win95
    b) because long-file-names aren't supported in the DOS version
    c) because the Win32 GUI version is much nicer to use under Win32
systems
    d) because the 16-bit version has inherent limits on file sizes, etc...