Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 16:47:03 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Peter Palotas <blizzar AT hem1 DOT passagen DOT se>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Call traceback.
In-Reply-To: <3.0.16.19980112143358.2987cd9c@hem1.passagen.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980112164405.3180E-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 12 Jan 1998, Peter Palotas wrote:

> I guess there isn't a portable way of doing this, i.e. a way that would
> work with GCC under Linux too??  (If not, do you know how to do this under
> Linux?)

Generally, in Unix-like systems you don't print a traceback, you generate 
a core dump.  The core file includes much more info than a traceback, 
since you can explore it with a debugger as if it were a running program.

I don't know how to generate a core file without aborting.