Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 13:09:35 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: "X DOT PONS AT UAB DOT ES" <ILGES AT cc DOT uab DOT es>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: system calls generate Segm.Viol. on NT
In-Reply-To: <01IQCDOK7NPI00JEYL@cc.uab.es>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.971124130850.23713I-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 23 Nov 1997, X DOT PONS AT UAB DOT ES wrote:

> But perhaps there is some important inconvenience in using
>   _crt0_startup_flags = _CRT0_FLAG_UNIX_SBRK
> in DOS, Win. 3.1x or Win. 95. Is there someone that could provide info
> about drawbacks of this?

Unixy sbrk doesn't mix well with hooking hardware interrupts and with
some DPMI servers (like QDPMI).