Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 18:08:18 +0200 (EET)
From: Sampo Niskanen <sampo AT compart DOT fi>
To: Nate Eldredge <eldredge AT ap DOT net>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: cwsdpmi and registers questions
In-Reply-To: <199710280112.RAA17320@adit.ap.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.971028180206.26044A-100000@lizard.compart.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


> [Charles already answered the other question]

What? Did I miss something in the newsgroup. I haven't atleast gotten any
mail on it. I don't seem to be able to get the old news-messages back, so
if you know how to pass commandline options to cwsdpmi (-s-), please mail
me how.

> (Don't pop your args!) I think with lower optimization levels you just got
> lucky and the function didn't happen to be using those registers.

I don't think so, because I have used a LOT of functions in asm that use
the registers, and they have worked fine. Also, I'd recall reading with
info, that without any optimization options, gcc will not use any
registers to store variables.

Thanks.

  __________________________________________________
 /____\    Sampo Niskanen <=> sampo AT compart DOT fi      \
       \         http://www.compart.fi/~sampo        \
        \     ________________________________________\___
         \___/___________________________________________/