Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 10:44:00 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Erik Max Francis <max AT alcyone DOT com>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [Q]: unsigned char
In-Reply-To: <3455476D.5F596E99@alcyone.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.971028104312.22947K-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 27 Oct 1997, Erik Max Francis wrote:

> Uh, no.  That would be '\\xfd'.  '\xfd' is perfectly standard ANSI C for
> 0xfd.

Then why does 0xFD print as 253 whereas '\xFD' prints as a large number?