Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 13:04:22 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: RHIDE Question.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.971019165847.27221L-100000@is>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.971022130156.1161D-100000@posaune.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 19 Oct 1997, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> And besides, you asked for a scenario where the order is significant,
> and I provided such a scenario, which I met in real-life programs.  I'm

I know them also, but I thought that they are not so common.

> RHIDE, but given that sometimes the order matters, isn't it best to
> just prevent RHIDE from sorting in the first place?

Maybe it's the best, but this would need much more work
by me, because a sorted project can be handled much better
than an unsorted :-(

Maybe I will change that (at least as an option) in the future.

Robert
******************************************************
* Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>              *
* Post:    Am Berg 3, D-09573 Dittmannsdorf, Germany *
* WWW:     http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~sho/rho        *
******************************************************