From: Weiqi Gao <weiqigao AT a DOT crl DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: SET's Editor v0.4.1 released
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 1997 15:49:55 -0500
Organization: Spectrum Healthcare Services
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <344920F3.24BF36C5@a.crl.com>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 971014104631 DOT 14214H-100000 AT is> <62b3r7$mt3$2 AT vnetnews DOT value DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: a116003.stl1.as.crl.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

M. Schulter wrote:
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> wrote:
> 
> : I don't want to start another editor war here, so let me say up front
> : that if somebody likes a certain editor more than others, or find it
> : easier to use, then they should use it and never look back.  There's
> : no sense in arguing about taste.
> 
> Agreeing with Eli that we don't want another editor war, please let me
> just add one point from my own experience.

An editors fate is not determined by its features, but rather where it's
author went after graduating college!

Take a look at the author/editor relationship chart below:
	EMACS - Richard Stallman, James Gosling
	vi    - Bill Joy

Do you know where your editor's author(s) are?  [Let's try to keep the
publisher out of this.]

--
Weiqi Gao
weiqigao AT a DOT crl DOT com