From: "John M. Aldrich" <fighteer AT cs DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: q: va_list and va_start?
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 22:22:13 +0000
Organization: Two pounds of chaos and a pinch of salt
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <3447E515.59FA@cs.com>
References: <199710160103 DOT SAA04702 AT adit DOT ap DOT net>
Reply-To: fighteer AT cs DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp224.cs.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Nate Eldredge wrote:
> 
> I would guess it was a simple omission. Writing that much documentation and
> making it match the library is not easy. If you see something that you think
> should be documented, say so! AFAIK, the maintainers would rather err on the
> side of over-documenting. Anyway, the va_* macros will be in the docs for
> next release.

The va_* macros were discussed in the docs for DJGPP v1.x, but were
omitted in the upgrade to v2.x.  I pointed this out once or twice on
djgpp-workers, but apparently nobody noticed.  :(

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|      John M. Aldrich       | "It may be better to be a live jackal|
|       aka Fighteer I       | than a dead lion, but it is better   |
|   mailto:fighteer AT cs DOT com   | still to be a live lion."            |
| http://www.cs.com/fighteer |                - Lazarus Long        |
---------------------------------------------------------------------