From: Robert Hoehne Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: ADA Problem Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 13:04:28 +0200 Organization: University of Technology Chemnitz, FRG Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <1 DOT 5 DOT 4 DOT 32 DOT 19971009204029 DOT 006a1c74 AT dce03 DOT ipt DOT br> <343E4C05 DOT 92DD118 AT isicom DOT fr> <1997Oct16 DOT 152144 DOT 6287 AT news> NNTP-Posting-Host: trompete.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII In-Reply-To: <1997Oct16.152144.6287@news> To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk On 16 Oct 1997, Gautier wrote: I haven't here the address of the original poster, but I must say, that at least I used the ADA compiler inside RHIDE without problems for the examples provided with GNAT. (as you got an undefined refernce to __dummy or so, you should look in you libgnat.a library if it is there). > The problem is from RHIDE, which seems still not compatible with GNAT. Here I'm now a little bit confused. When I remember correct you was the person who asked me to implement in RHIDE the ADA support. Now (or already some time ago) I made this and got no negative replies. So I do not understand you when you say now as an answer to an other user that RHIDE is still not compatible with GNAT. If you see any problems, why not posting them?? BTW: The only Problem which I can see is currently the debugging thing (but not my fault!) and, that the ADA maintainer are not able to port ADA at least to DJGPP 2.01 but still using DJGPP 2.0 which is now really an old DJGPP version which has some bugs. So pelase do not post here such phrases about incompatibility between RHIDE and GNAT without details. I was really a little bit frustrated about this post. Robert ****************************************************** * Robert Hoehne * * Post: Am Berg 3, D-09573 Dittmannsdorf, Germany * * WWW: http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~sho/rho * ******************************************************