Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: The future of Djgpp
Distribution: world
From: vischne AT ibm DOT net-nospam (root)
Organization: The Light
References: <6239qf$5ur AT mtinsc04 DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
 <Pine DOT GSO DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 971015185926 DOT 1055A-100000 AT catbert DOT ucdavis DOT edu>
 <34458283 DOT 0 AT news3 DOT ibm DOT net> <upW1$CAeQhR0Ew3$@smgcia.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.100.34.175
Message-ID: <3446efc0.0@news3.ibm.net>
Date: 17 Oct 97 04:55:28 GMT
Lines: 17
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

In article <upW1$CAeQhR0Ew3$@smgcia.demon.co.uk>, stuart AT smgcia DOT demon DOT co DOT uk 
says...
>
>>This is a problem now, since DJGPP 2 doesn't support the new Win95 file
>>names.  (To tell the honest truth, Win95 doesn't support the new file names
>>completely either.  Just do a lookup on a CDRom with long file names, and
>>see what it gets you.)
>>
>yes it does, if you add 
>
>+LFN=y
>
>to the /djgpp/djgpp.env file.

Thank you for the info.  Now, if Win95 would read long file names from a
CD Rom, we'd be in complete agreement.