From: Genady Beryozkin Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Why not build in inline 80x86 assembly, like in borland C Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 22:19:13 +0200 Organization: The Technion Lines: 40 Message-ID: <34452541.505CB073@t2.technion.ac.il> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.115.49.8 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------F56DF110A13DA833E3DEC427" To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------F56DF110A13DA833E3DEC427 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > This still requires a translator to be driven by gcc. And we know that > such a critter doesn't exist. The most rediculous thing about it is that when I debug my AT&T style code with that FSDB debugger, I get it back in INTEL style ! I also agree that INTEL&TASM&MASM etc standard is a little more wide-used than AT&T standard - so why do you bother to waste your time just for compatibility with SPARC & other ? Assembler is supposed to be machine-dependent. Genady --------------F56DF110A13DA833E3DEC427 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="vcard.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Genady Beryozkin Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vcard.vcf" begin: vcard fn: Genady Beryozkin n: Beryozkin;Genady org: The Technion adr: ;;;Natzrat Illit / Haifa;;;Israel email;internet: c0467082 AT t2 DOT technion DOT ac DOT il note: Homepage : http://t2.technion.ac.il/~c0467082/ x-mozilla-cpt: ;0 x-mozilla-html: FALSE version: 2.1 end: vcard --------------F56DF110A13DA833E3DEC427--