Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 12:36:17 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>
To: Peter Palotas <blizzar AT hem1 DOT passagen DOT se>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: RHIDE suggestion (was: RHIDE Question.)
In-Reply-To: <3.0.16.19971015213458.43df8eb0@hem1.passagen.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.971017123215.819A-100000@trompete.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 16 Oct 1997, Peter Palotas wrote:

> >Because there is no reason to do that, what you want must be done in other
> way. 
> >In my opinion the best thing is support some kind of cross-dependencies,
> that's 
> >dependencies between project items, but again the last word is the Robert's 
> >one.

This exactly the correct description. That means, bison, flex and all the
other tools which need in general more than one compile step and which
_produce_ files which are dependencies of other files should be handled
in an other way then simply reordering the project items.

But this will take some time be until I get a good thought _how_ to
do it.

> don't you think? (the cross-dependecies thing!?). Well, Robert doesn't have
> any e-mail right now as of what I've heard, so I guess he won't be able to

Of course I have, but currently I do not answer so much, since there
are also other helpfull people who can answer.

Robert
******************************************************
* Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>              *
* Post:    Am Berg 3, D-09573 Dittmannsdorf, Germany *
* WWW:     http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~sho/rho        *
******************************************************