From: Stuart MacGregor <stuart AT smgcia DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: The future of Djgpp
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 14:18:22 +0100
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <upW1$CAeQhR0Ew3$@smgcia.demon.co.uk>
References: <6239qf$5ur AT mtinsc04 DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
 <Pine DOT GSO DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 971015185926 DOT 1055A-100000 AT catbert DOT ucdavis DOT edu>
 <34458283 DOT 0 AT news3 DOT ibm DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: smgcia.demon.co.uk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 12
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

>This is a problem now, since DJGPP 2 doesn't support the new Win95 file
>names.  (To tell the honest truth, Win95 doesn't support the new file names
>completely either.  Just do a lookup on a CDRom with long file names, and
>see what it gets you.)
>
yes it does, if you add 

+LFN=y

to the /djgpp/djgpp.env file.
-- 
Stuart MacGregor