Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 08:04:00 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Wojciech Piechowski <voyt AT delta DOT ds2 DOT pg DOT gda DOT pl>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: RHIDE suggestion (was: RHIDE Question.)
In-Reply-To: <3.0.16.19971015213458.43df8eb0@hem1.passagen.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.971016075532.15612A-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk



On Wed, 15 Oct 1997, Peter Palotas wrote:

> >> and being able to move them around in the project
> >> window so that you could specify in what order to compile them!? 
> >Because there is no reason to do that, what you want must be done in other
> way. 
> >In my opinion the best thing is support some kind of cross-dependencies,
> that's 
> >dependencies between project items, but again the last word is the Robert's 
> >one.
> 
> You are totally right about this. But this would be a good thing anyway,
> don't you think? (the cross-dependecies thing!?). Well, Robert doesn't have


What do you think about an idea in Borland C++ >=4.0: multiple targets ?
In one project it is possible to create more things than one .exe. The
first target can be one which creates a source file and second may use it.
However it would require adding something which is not in Borland's.
There could be an option that, when enabled, would run specified .exe (or
just general DOS command) before building a given target. I think it would
solve the mentioned problem and many more.