received: from rap-wct242.katowice.tpnet.pl by free.polbox.pl (5.65v3.2/1.1.10.5/30Sep97-1012PM)
	id AB23180; Mon, 6 Oct 1997 00:22:51 +0200
message-id: <9710052222.AB23180@free.polbox.pl>
From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Robert_Darmochwa=B3?=" <kacmajor AT polbox DOT com>
To: <rwh AT WORLDONLINE DOT NL>, <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
subject: Re: Why not build in inline 80x86 assembly, like in borland C
date: Sun, 5 Oct 1997 21:26:51 +0100
x-msmail-priority: Normal
x-priority: 3
x-mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
mime-version: 1.0
content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk



----------
> From: Reinier Heeres <rwh AT worldonline DOT nl>
> To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
> Subject: Why not build in inline 80x86 assembly, like in borland C
> Date: 4 padziernika 1997 11:47
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I would like to know if there are any other guys who'd like to see
> NORMAL 80x86 assembly inline in their programs? Why isn't it build in?
> Only because of the portability???
> 
> Reinier
> 
> --
> -----------------------> RwH <------------------------
> RwH's page / Programming stuff: http://www.dra.nl/~rwh
> Email: rwh AT worldonline DOT nl
> 
> 
> 
> -- [ REKLAMA / ADVERTISEMENT ] ------------------------
> 
>                 WPADNIJ, ZEBY NIE WPASC!
>                  http://www.ako2.com.pl
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> 
>
YEAH ,I CERTAINLY AGREE.