Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 17:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199710100003.RAA14853@adit.ap.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
From: Nate Eldredge <eldredge AT ap DOT net>
Subject: Re: MAKEing EDEBUG32 (fwd)
Cc: "D. Hibbs" <mtx064 AT coventry DOT ac DOT uk>
Precedence: bulk

At 11:11  10/8/1997 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
>If anybody has a solution, please help Dominic.  I have never tried to 
>rebuild EDEBUG.
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 10:06:14 +0100 (BST)
>From: D. Hibbs <mtx064 AT coventry DOT ac DOT uk>
>To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
>Subject: MAKEing EDEBUG32
>
>I am posting this to you as I don't feel it would be of general interest 
>and I think you are the most likely person to be able to answer the question.
>
>I have modified UNASSMBL so that it unassembles to AT & T syntax
>  (I did this for V1 with success)
>and DEBUG - some small enhancements
>When I run MAKE (It is the version form DJGPP\BIN) it returns without 
>error but there is no change to the existing copy of EDEBUG32 nor any 
>sign of a new copy that I can find.
>
>The MAKEFILE in V2 calls other makefiles and I do not understand what 
>they are doing.  The MAKEFILE in V1 worked with no changes needed when I 
>did this before.
>
>Unfortunately the machine on which I do the DJGPP work is eighty miles 
>from the machine from which I have email access and I commute between 
>them each week - Therefore if you can suggest a solution it will be at 
>least next week before I can test and reply so don't feel that your reply 
>is of no value because I did not reply immediately.
The rebuilding of the debuggers is strange. Running `make' just rebuilds the
debugging libraries, while `make e' builds the actual executable.
If you enter the src/debug/edebug directory, and type `make e', the debugger
should be remade and copied into djgpp/bin.

HTH

Nate Eldredge
eldredge AT ap DOT net