Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 13:32:37 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: eyal DOT ben-david AT aks DOT com
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Why not build in inline 80x86 assembly, like in borland C
In-Reply-To: <4225652A.003E5828.00@aks.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.971008133146.28780E-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 8 Oct 1997 eyal DOT ben-david AT aks DOT com wrote:

> He probably meant that gcc will be used as a driver program
> for a  *.asm  to  *.s translator (it is a driver for many different
> compilers anyway)

This still requires a translator to be driven by gcc.  And we know that 
such a critter doesn't exist.