From: Vic <tudor AT cam DOT org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Allegro polygons (was (none))
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 1997 17:30:20 -0400
Organization: Communications Accessibles Montreal, Quebec Canada
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <3436B56C.7C14@cam.org>
References: <9710010025 DOT AA03411 AT free DOT polbox DOT pl> <tXB4xLAG$iN0EwEX AT talula DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dynppp-169.hip.cam.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Shawn Hargreaves wrote:
On
> a 486 the fixed point version will be a lot faster, on a Pentium they
> are probably about equal. Use whichever format your own code works best
> with...
Hmm, it really depends... On my P133 I found out that the speed of my
affine texture mapper increased if I used your fixed point
format&functions than if I used floats...
-- 
--> http://www.cam.org/~tudor <--
Go ahead and build another Messiah
We dig another grave...