From: Vic <tudor AT cam DOT org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Why not build in inline 80x86 assembly, like in borland C
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 1997 09:08:56 -0400
Organization: Communications Accessibles Montreal, Quebec Canada
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <34363FE8.5AD@cam.org>
References: <34361EA4 DOT BFFADE9E AT worldonline DOT nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dynamicppp-181.hip.cam.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Reinier Heeres wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I would like to know if there are any other guys who'd like to see
> NORMAL 80x86 assembly inline in their programs? Why isn't it build in?
> Only because of the portability???
What do you mean by NORMAL assembly? Intel syntax? I don't consider that
*normal*, both syntaxes are normal. Then, what else?
-- 
--> http://www.cam.org/~tudor <--
Go ahead and build another Messiah
We dig another grave...