From: sydbarrett AT mindspring DOT com (Victor Escobar)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: 32bit DOS.
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 21:38:00 GMT
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <34307ca1.7709075@news.mindspring.com>
References: <Pine DOT SOL DOT 3 DOT 94 DOT 970915182420 DOT 28764A-100000 AT taz> <874456398 DOT 792858 AT smyrno DOT sol DOT net> <5vnons$2ps$1 AT vnetnews DOT value DOT net> <34268476 DOT 0 AT 139 DOT 134 DOT 5 DOT 33> <slrn62dkjj DOT sse DOT dmlloyd AT earth DOT execpc DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: user-38lc6cg.dialup.mindspring.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

On 22 Sep 1997 20:17:55 GMT, dmlloyd AT earth DOT execpc DOT com (David Lloyd)
wrote:

>In article <34268476 DOT 0 AT 139 DOT 134 DOT 5 DOT 33>, Herman Schoenfeld wrote:
>>In article <5vnons$2ps$1 AT vnetnews DOT value DOT net>, mschulter AT value DOT net says...
><Chop>
>>I don't think a new DOS is the right way to go. Perhaps a windows like OS which 
>>could run MS-WINDOWS programs is the right heading.
>
>You know, you may be onto something there...
>
>Maybe a free, generic version of Windows is not such a bad idea, if it
>could be pulled off.
>
There's already such a project:  it's called FreeWin95.  Search the
WWW for it. :)