Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 08:17:02 +0800 (GMT)
From: Orlando Andico <orly AT dilnet DOT upd DOT edu DOT ph>
To: Thomas Djafari <tdjafari AT nordnet DOT fr>
cc: DJGPP List Server <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <5vomfv$bch$1@news.internetsat.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.96.970918081518.16340A-100000@gibson.eee.upd.edu.ph>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 17 Sep 1997, Thomas Djafari wrote:

> 
> I made some tests between watcom and djgpp yesterday
> 
..

This is a good idea, but your benchmarks aren't particularly hot. Perhaps
a better benchmark to use would be LINPACK. This is a standard benchmark
in the supercomputer world, and really exercises the compiler's FPU
optimization. Try solving a 1000x1000 matrix with LINPACK, the memory
consumed alone would stress other parts of the system, not just the code
optimizer.
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Orlando Alcantara Andico
WWW:   http://www2.mozcom.com/~orly/         Email: orly AT mozcom DOT com
ICBM:  14 30 00 N  120 59 00 E               POTS:  (+632) 932-2385