From: mdekker AT wins DOT uva DOT nl (Martijn Dekker) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,rec.games.programmer Subject: Re: The numer 1 compiler, DJGPP or MSVC Here's a good rating comparision Date: 17 Sep 1997 16:29:18 +0200 Organization: FWINS, University of Amsterdam Lines: 30 Distribution: world Message-ID: <5vopfu$31s$1@turing.wins.uva.nl> References: <34 NNTP-Posting-Host: turing.wins.uva.nl To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk In article sumatose AT NOSPAM DOT usa DOT net writes: ++ ++In group rec.games.programmer, Herman Schoenfeld says... ++> Brian Hook has stated several times that id are using MSVC. I don't know if ++> Carmack's gone on record, but they are using MSVC... There will be no DOS ++> version of Quake 2. ++ ++> ID used MSVC to design QUAKE as well. Released in DJGPP. I already stated that ++> building code in MSVC is preferable, however, releasing is definatly not. ++ ++WinQuake and GLQuake were BOTH SHIPPED AND RELEASE WITH MICROSOFT ++VISUAL C++ 4.x. Quake DOS was built and release with gcc only. ++(and designed on NeXT, so fuck you.) Hey : Read Abrash sometime, ++and check the actual programs's executable, would ya? ++ ++>> I tire of you. ++ ++And we're all sick of you. And curious about how many apps ++you've actually shipped, also. ++ I seem to remember reading in Carmacks .plan that Quake was to be their LAST dos program they (idsoftware) would make. -- Martijn Dekker -- mdekker AT wins DOT uva DOT nl UvA - Math department Universiteit van Amsterdam PFF - Computer Games for X11/win95/NT and Online Java games http://turing.wins.uva.nl/~mdekker/pff/ (Xcogitate, Templar)