From: "Chris Lomont" <clomont AT omni DOT cc DOT purdue DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,rec.games.programmer
Subject: Re: The numer 1 compiler, DJGPP or MSVC  Here's a good rating comparision
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 17:21:39 -0500
Organization: Izi Wa Computer Misc
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <5v76id$rn3@mozo.cc.purdue.edu>
References: <3412BD25 DOT 1F30 AT mho DOT net> <3412DDA8 DOT C428AF45 AT a DOT crl DOT com> <341316EA DOT E14 AT mho DOT net> <34158665 DOT 8731090 AT news DOT concentric DOT net> <34148F08 DOT 7A16 AT pacbell DOT net> <5v5fm1$iku$1 AT vixen DOT cso DOT uiuc DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: omni.cc.purdue.edu
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

 db <*bowlin*@*uiuc.edu*> wrote in article
<5v5fm1$iku$1 AT vixen DOT cso DOT uiuc DOT edu>...
>1.)BC++ 5.02,Symantec C++ and Watcom C++ produce faster and smaller
>executables than MSVC++ 5.0.

Please post some  references for these claims. The results I've heard so far
put MSVC 5.0 exe's faster and smaller than each of those other compilers.

Chris Lomont