From: Paul Shirley <Paul AT no DOT spam DOT please>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Near, far, and error messages
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 14:20:05 +0100
Organization: wot? me?
Lines: 13
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <eAZtBFAFQWD0EwTn@foobar.co.uk>
References: <5uir5n$rk2 AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca>
Reply-To: Paul Shirley <Paul AT chocolat DOT obvious DOT fake DOT foobar DOT co DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: chocolat.foobar.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

In article <5uir5n$rk2 AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca>, Paul Derbyshire
<ao950 AT FreeNet DOT Carleton DOT CA> writes
>As a compromise to changing the FAQ about near and far (and huge?  never
>seen that), perhaps instead DJGPP can be twiddled slightly to display a
>more explicit error message about near and far, or else to silently ignore
>them.

Since near,far and huge are *not* C reserved words this would be a
compiler error if added to gcc. Get a clue.

---
Visit www.dukepsx.com: see what I do all day.
Paul Shirley: my email address is 'obvious'ly anti-spammed