From: Jeff Weeks <pweeks AT execulink DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Future version of MacOS code named Allegro
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 11:07:26 -0400
Organization: Code X Software
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <33D37B2E.4825D994@execulink.com>
References: <5qpg62$3is$1 AT canopus DOT cc DOT umanitoba DOT ca> <5qv80b$hd1 AT sun3 DOT uni-essen DOT de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp26.pluto.execulink.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Peter Gerwinski wrote:
> 
> Kevin Bagnall (umbagnal AT cc DOT umanitoba DOT ca) wrote:
> > It's like when you meet someone with the same name as yours and you say "hey!,
> > you have the same name as me, that's so cool, meaningless, but cool!"
> 
> If they make `Allegro' a trademark, this could become a problem.
> The same happened for the `Spinner' WWW daemon which is now called
> `Roxen', and somebody tried (is still trying?) the same for `Linux'.

I don't think that'll be a problem.  It's just a code name right?  Win95
was code named Chicago... they never used the name, or copyrighted it,
as far as I know.  Same with Copland and all those other code names. 
They're just temporary.

--------------------------------------------
            - Code X Software -
       Programming to a Higher Power
  
  email: mailto:pweeks AT execulink DOT com
  web:	 http://www.execulink.com/~pweeks/
--------------------------------------------