Message-Id: <m0wk9cC-000S1eC@inti.edu.ar>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <salvador AT natacha DOT inti DOT edu DOT ar>
From: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT edu DOT ar>
Organization: INTI
To: dibald AT netcom DOT com (Dave Baldwin), djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 1997 18:05:52 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: IRQ trap with stack change, very intersting!
Precedence: bulk

dibald AT netcom DOT com (Dave Baldwin) wrote:
> Romano Signorelli (signorelli AT gefran DOT it) wrote:
> : I'm trying to trap IRQ 10 (interrupt 0x71), also IRQ 8 (interrupt 0x1c).
> 
> I don't know about the rest, but I'm pretty sure that IRQ 8 is 0x70 and 
> IRQ 10 is 0x72.  And IRQ 8 is hardwired to the 'RTC'.
True, at least if he isn't counting the IRQ 0 as 1.

SET 
------------------------------------ 0 --------------------------------
Visit my home page: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA
TE: +(541) 759 0013