Newsgroups: alt.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.msdos.programmer
From: dibald AT netcom DOT com (Dave Baldwin)
Subject: Re: IRQ trap with stack change, very intersting!
Message-ID: <dibaldECssG7.GzL@netcom.com>
Followup-To: alt.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.msdos.programmer
Organization: Netcom On-Line Services
References: <01bc8552$054435a0$6f02a8c0 AT uiemurs DOT gefran DOT it>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 1997 14:04:55 GMT
Lines: 10
Sender: dibald AT netcom11 DOT netcom DOT com
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Romano Signorelli (signorelli AT gefran DOT it) wrote:
: I'm trying to trap IRQ 10 (interrupt 0x71), also IRQ 8 (interrupt 0x1c).

I don't know about the rest, but I'm pretty sure that IRQ 8 is 0x70 and 
IRQ 10 is 0x72.  And IRQ 8 is hardwired to the 'RTC'.
-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Check out DIBs and TCJ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Dave Baldwin: dibald AT netcom DOT com | The Computer Journal 1(800)424-8825
DIBs Electronic Design          | Home page "http://www.psyber.com/~tcj/"
Voice :       (916) 722-3877    | Hands-on hardware and software 
TCJ/DIBs BBS: (916) 722-5799    | TCJ/DIBs FAX: (916) 722-7480   
-=-=-=-=-=-=-  @#$%^&* I can't even quote myself!  Oh,well. -=-=-=-=-=-=-