Date: Sun, 25 May 1997 13:28:40 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Dave McNeill <dmcneill AT pne DOT co DOT uk>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: __dpmi_int
In-Reply-To: <33855b4e.1375969@news.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970525132811.4960D-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Fri, 23 May 1997, Dave McNeill wrote:

> >Did you delete the docs also?
> 
> Actually, 'info libc func dpmi __dpmi_int' states
> that the function returns '-1 on error, else zero'.
> Nothing is mentioned about the contents of the
> __dpmi_regs structure.

There is a pointer there to the DPMI spec, which you should read for
more details.