From: Andrew Crabtree <andrewc AT typhoon DOT rose DOT hp DOT com>
Message-Id: <199705220409.AA296994169@typhoon.rose.hp.com>
Subject: Re: PGCC 'as' patch
To: dlydiard AT linknet DOT kitsap DOT lib DOT wa DOT us (KaRNaGE)
Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 21:09:29 PDT
Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.970521192921.12025A-100000@linknet.kitsap.lib.wa.us>; from "KaRNaGE" at May 21, 97 7:31 pm
Precedence: bulk

 > i'm glad to say that the -m486/-i486 options now work just fine...

Glad to hear it

> i was
> wondering if there's any -?586 options ..i notices that gcc takes the
> -m586 without any errors but, cc1.exe complains about the option...will
> there be anything like that in the future?...

I think (not sure here), that gcc uses a sort of macro like facility from
the specs file to change the -m586 to some other options that get passed
to cc1.

Andrew