From: quacci AT vera DOT com (jon)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Emacs or RHide
Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 17:52:27 GMT
Organization: Yale University
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <3377583e.18169086@news.cis.yale.edu>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970511120706 DOT 27751J-100000 AT is> <337617E2 DOT 4450 AT voyageur DOT ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: slip-ppp-node-05.cs.yale.edu
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 11 May 1997 14:02:59 -0500, "J. Ellis" <cellis AT voyageur DOT ca>
wrote:

<...>
>> On Thu, 8 May 1997, J. Ellis wrote:
> But, coming from a DOS
>background, I think I'll stick to RHIDE.  I don't understand UNIX enough
>to use Emacs (Does this mean I shouldn't be using DJGPP either??). 
>Anyway, that's about it:-|

SUre, you should be using DJGPP! And Rhide should be exactly what you
need, because it puts DJGPP squarely in a DOS-like environment.
Without Rhide, I think you'll at first find compiling to be tedious
and cryptic, and debugging almost impossible.