From: Erik Max Francis Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: C++ front end bug Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 09:54:49 -0700 Organization: Alcyone Systems Lines: 20 Message-ID: <3379EE59.6C5EBA67@alcyone.com> References: <5l8qq3$gdd AT freenet-news DOT carleton DOT ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: newton.alcyone.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk Paul Derbyshire wrote: > Given > > int aa[]={3,4,5} > > aa is a pointer to int, type int *. > &aa is a pointer to a pointer to ints type int ** or maybe to an array, > int (*)[3], if the array is static. Eh? The & operator when applied to an array name is completely superfluous. -- Erik Max Francis, &tSftDotIotE / email / max AT alcyone DOT com Alcyone Systems / web / http://www.alcyone.com/max/ San Jose, California, United States / icbm / 37 20 07 N 121 53 38 W \ "The future / is right there." / Bill Moyers