From: ab799 AT hwcn DOT org (Billal Chaudhry)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp,rec.games.programmer
Subject: Re: Allegro
Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 03:28:53 GMT
Organization: ACC TelEnterprises Ltd.
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <3378df4c.7782253@news.ican.net>
References: <3373D6A4 DOT 218A AT voyageur DOT ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-069.hamilton-02.ican.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 09 May 1997 21:00:05 -0500, "J. Ellis" <cellis AT voyageur DOT ca>
wrote:

>I just set up Allegro on my system, and now I have a question:  Can I go
>ahead and delete the directory (and files) that I unzipped allegro into? 
>The liballeg.a file was copied into my DJGPP dir, but does the lib
>recquire any files from the allegro dir (you can tell I'm a newbie;-)?

kill the dir...i said kill it....show no mercy..geeez..:)
(no it don't need it...but there are cool demos in there..heheheh)

>Also, I'm starting to get sort of confused about this 32-bit stuff.  I
>read that DJGPP produced great 32-bit executables, but it sucks with
>16-bit exe's.  I thought that DJGPP could ONLY produce 32-bit code!! 
>Was I misinformed?  Also, when everyone says that DJGPP's 32-bit exe's
>are great, does that mean just great in 32-bit OS's (unix, winNT, etc.)?
>Or are they also very fast under DOS with CWSDPMI??  The reason I ask is
>this:  I own Turbo C++ v3.0, and unless DJGPP is quite a bit faster
>under DOS, I will opt for TC's ease of use.  I wish that someone could
>just post some benchmarks under various operating systems to comapare
>DJGPP with commercial compilers.  Anyway, that's about it.  Thank-you
>all for your help, and all the help you've given me in the past:-)

put it this way do you like quake by ID Software? well if you do guess
where it was built...yesiree bob rite under djgpp..now if that isn't
enuff proof well then.............