From: nitehawk91 AT aol DOT com (NiteHawk91)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re : MODEX
Date: 9 May 1997 05:12:57 GMT
Organization: AOL Bertelsmann Online GmbH & Co. KG http://www.germany.aol.com
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <19970509051200.BAA03321@ladder01.news.aol.com>
References: <5kkldj$498 AT news DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder01.news.aol.com
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Im Artikel <199705051033 DOT MAA18919 AT ippc57 DOT cicrp DOT jussieu DOT fr>,
p6inf700 AT maya DOT cicrp DOT jussieu DOT fr (Jimmy OBERTAN) schreibt:

>Hi!
>
>Tell me if it's wrong but there is not only two resolution in modex.
>With an old version of xlib ported to djgpp, there is up to 17 modex
>resolution.
>
>A+
>Dr. Slime
>
>

You're right. By changing Bits 7 & 0-3 from the CRCT register 9(Maximum
Row Address), you can divide the resoulutions down to 320x 12,5.(320x400
is the maximum ModeX resolution) But what would this be good for ? (The
only thing I can imagine of is to stretch a picture....)

Matthias
<NiteHawk91 AT aol DOT com>

*Artificial intelligence is better than natural stupidity