From: Tudor <tudor AT cam DOT org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Quake and DJGPP
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 1997 15:02:13 -0400
Organization: Communications Accesibles Montreal
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <3363A2B5.62B7@cam.org>
References: <199704171047 DOT GAA11427 AT delorie DOT com> <3355D5CB DOT 2631 AT NO DOT SPAM DOT cs DOT com> <5j8lpo$lk4 AT elmo DOT cadvision DOT com> <33581923 DOT 3CB5 AT NO DOT SPAM DOT cs DOT com> <33595708 DOT 4054429 AT news DOT ionsys DOT com> <335E8D21 DOT 79DD AT cam DOT org> <335f89db DOT 362037 AT news DOT ping DOT be>
Reply-To: tudor AT cam DOT org
NNTP-Posting-Host: dynamicppp-213.hip.cam.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Dominique Biesmans wrote:
> 1. Winquake is actually a little faster than the DOS version. (unless
> you'll run it on a low-end PC (e.g. a 486 with 8Mb)
No, I have a P133 16 mb ram. But windoze95 is a piece of sh*t and moves
like it's dead or something.
> 2. Id has anounced they won't make any DOS products anymore.
Why? I have warcraft for Dos and it's cool and all, while the
command&conquer for Windoze95 crashes 10 times a day...
> 3. There is a windows version of Quake that uses OpenGL (GLQuake) and
> it's actually very slow on a non-openGL machine, maybe that's what you
> mean?
No, my mistake. The normal Dos version of Quake runs in a windoze window
but very slow.
Ok, they don't support dos anymore. What about UNIX/LINUX/etc ?
-- 
tudor 'at' cam 'dot' org
http://www.cam.org/~tudor
'This is Scott Nudds of the Borg. C is irrelevant.'