From: jb3207 AT eclipse DOT co DOT uk (Jason Barstow)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: testing uclock()
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 18:48:43 GMT
Organization: Jabber Interactive
Reply-To: jb3207 AT eclipse DOT co DOT uk
References: <1 DOT 5 DOT 4 DOT 32 DOT 19970424124818 DOT 002d7ec8 AT ubeclu DOT unibe DOT ch>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.188.32.221
Message-ID: <3360fc7f.0@ispc-news.cableinet.net>
Lines: 11
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Roger Noss <noss AT pupk DOT unibe DOT ch> wrote:
>Also, every third or fourth value is negative - why?
Yes,yes,
I've noticed this too.
Running in Win95 *and* DOS too (I think).
I was using uclock() to time the joysticks but the -ves
really screwed things up. In the end a wrote a "wrapper"
that ignored -ves. Of course I also timed it several times
and took an average.